Saturday, July 10, 2010

J-15 finally appearing?

We've received the first good clear picture of what appears to be J-15, the naval fighter jet to be used on future aircraft carriers.


On a side note, it looks like PLAN's aviation arm is going to be taking some J-10s, although I doubt those will actually be naval fighters.

18 comments:

Wen said...

that's amazing! people have guts these days!!

thanks for sharing though :)

can't really tell any difference from su-33 from this angle, but what do you reckon, feng?

竹青 said...

要照顧身體歐~保重..................................................................

Sean O'Connor said...

The only visible difference so far from an Su-33 is the J-11B style wingtip rails.

江冠彭珮李佳宏陽筠 said...

很喜歡看看別人的生活故事,謝謝您的分享哦~~............................................................

Jiang said...

Feng, the russians are once again downplaying Chinese. I just checked J-15 on Wikapidea. They say that it is not as good as SU-33

But I know that J-15 has the avonics and radar from J-11B which are at least 25 years more advanced than SU-33.

What do you think??

btl25 said...

With the release of pictures of what is allegedely the J-15, I'm a bit disapointed that they didn't try to incorporate canted tails like those found in the F-18 and the new F-15 Silent Eagle into the prototype aircraft.

I hope that there's a 2nd J-15 prototype in the works that has canted tails, though I'm not holding my breath over it. My understanding is that canted tails can give you reduced radar cross-section and a lower take-off speed, which would be ideal in a carrier aircraft.

Jiang said...

btl25, you are right. The F-15SE has frontal stealthness such as canted vertical stabalizer, and internal weapon carrying ability, which gives it combat advantage.

Hope the next J-11 will have such features

auditions-auditions said...

Hi,

Great post, I like this post.
I 've added your blog to My Blog Roll at


http://auditions-auditions.blogspot.com


So would you put my blog too, on you...

you can get healthy traffic from us and our visitors can get

relative and useful information form your site.

Hope you would add my blog.
Thanks a lot.Keep blogging....

Feng said...

hmm, don't expect too much out of SAC with this one. Their goal is to just get something out there that works. Why do people expect something that different from su-33?

Remember, the carrier should be ready by 2015. Do you really want to get that risky with the fighter jet?

Maduafokwa said...

Its pretty cool, but why cant the chinese do some thing of their own...?

dawsonfelicia張君dawsonfelicia均 said...

very popular to u!..................................................................

莊雅和莊雅和莊雅和 said...

命運,就是自己行為的結果。..................................................

ju吳phe宇te佳ns said...

拒絕冒險和成長的人,終將被生命的潮流陶汰。..................................................

cara-blog said...

good blog, thanks for this good information :)

莊雅和莊雅和莊雅和 said...

找一個懂妳的人也期許自己做一個人懂別人的人~.........................................

Segregator236 said...

I heard from many Chinese sources that the carrier-based J-10 will be twin-engined and be called the J-10C.

It will have 2 RD-33 engines and will have similar configuration to the J-10B.

It made its first flight in 2009 and will be deployed soon.

* Note: the RD-33 is a small engine, so the airframe doesn't need a significant enlargement.

Feng said...

they are not going with J-10 for naval fighter

Asian Defence at asian defense and chinese and indian defence news said...

GOOD BUT RUSSIANS SAID THAT IT IS FOR BEHIND IN TECHNOLOGY THAN SU-33
Asian Defence